active participation in elections

Portland voters are among the most active in the U.S. But access to the ballot and engagement is not equal for all. Over the last couple of decades, we see consistent differences in voter participation for young voters and voters who live in more racially diverse and low income neighborhoods. Additionally, we see far lower participation across all demographics and neighborhoods in May primary elections.

Portland’s 2021-22 Charter Commission hoped that changes to the local government system starting this November would lead to a “participatory and growing democracy” with “more voices being heard in elections.”

tracking this goal:

Increased voter participation in future elections could reflect progress toward this goal.

One year of new data won’t be enough to establish trends or identify the root causes. Several years of data will be needed to accurately assess the impact of the new system of elections on voter participation. Learn more about the types of data we’re using, and how to include it in responsible analysis.

diving deeper

race, income, and voter participation

When a person registers to vote, they provide certain information that can be directly connected to them when they cast a ballot — their address, age, and political party (if any). It is relatively simple to analyze voter participation trends connected to the age and political party of voters, and where they live. We can say with certainty “Velma Voter is 23 years old, lives in the Cully neighborhood, and voted in 2022.”

Analyzing voter participation trends connected to other characteristics is more challenging. Race, income, education, or homeownership status are not data collected on the voter registration form. So, analyzing voting trends related to these demographics requires gathering and analyzing data at the community level rather than the individual level.

We cannot say “Velma Voter is a lower income white homeowner.” Instead, we can say, “Velma Voter lives in the Cully neighborhood, which is a lower income and more racially diverse neighborhood in Portland. Overall voter turnout in that precinct is lower than in neighboring precincts.”

By the same token, we can say “Voter participation in lower income and more racially diverse neighborhoods is lower.” But we have to be careful about claiming “BIPOC voters are less likely to vote,” because we do not have data that link voting behavior and race at the individual level.

There are several ways researchers can strengthen observations about the relationship between demographic data like race or income with voter participation data. We’re working on some of this analysis, and should have it available in the coming months.

community connections

Community groups can help to increase voter turnout.

NextUp, for example, is a local organization that helps more young people get engaged in civic life with voter registration and voter education programs, and could help to bridge the age gap in turnout. Organizations that serve culturally specific communities, like the Asian Pacific American Network of Oregon (APANO) and Native American Youth and Family Center (NAYA) help to bride the gap in voter participation in communities of color.

Organizations like AARP and the League of Women Voters also help keep older adults engaged in civic life.